Dicedok dari http://hambalialorstari.blogspot.com/
untuk panduan saya dan semua.............
Pernah ketika penulis mendengar Bayan Suboh (Kuliah Suboh) Maulana Umar Palampuri, dalam menceritakan seorang musoh Islam yang berkeinginan membunoh Nabi saw, namun kesudahannya beliau mendapat hidayat dari Allah swt. Semua yang mendengar memahami bahawa kisah itu adalah kisah Saidina Umar r.a . Namun kerana disebalik kisah berkenaan ada sedikit kerendahan kepada sahabat Nabi saw beliau tidak menyebut nama Saidina Umar r.a di dalam menceritakan kisah berkenaan. Ini adalah kerana ada larangan dari Nabi saw agar tidak menghina para-para sahabat di dalam banyak riwayat.
Sahl bin Abdillah rah berkata, “ Barang siapa yang tidak menghurmati para sahabat r.hum maka ia tidak beriman kepada Rasulullah saw.”
Berkaitan dengan kisah anak Saidina Umar r.a, Ulama-ulama Hadis sepakat mengatakan bahawa kisah berkenaan terdapat unsur “tabbara” yang biasanya diketengahkan oleh gulongan “Rawafid” atau Syiah. Memang terkenal di dalam sejarah sampai ke hari ini bahawa gulongan Syiah cukup benci dan sentiasa melaknati sahabat Nabi saw di dalam doa-doa mereka dan khutbah-khutbah mereka.
“Tabbara” adalah satu konsep yang telah menjadi prinsip di dalam perancangan musoh-musoh Islam khususnya Syiah untuk melaknati sahabat-sahabat Nabi saw secara tersembunyi melalui cereka-cereka atau hikayat-hikayat yang pada lahirnya nampak seolah-olah memuji namun pada hakikatnya adalah penghinaan dan cemuhan. Di dalam ilmu Balaghah ianya dikenali dengan “ Ta’kiduu Adzzammi bima yusybihu al madha” atau “celaan di dalam bentuk pujian”
Ulama-ulama di dalam bidang hadis menghukumkan riwayat di dalam kisah berkenaan adalah “maudhu” atau palsu. Imam Ibn al- Jauzi rah berkata, “ Hadis berkenaan adalah maudhu’. Ia telah direka oleh ahli cerita. Banyak perkara karut yang terdapat di dalamnya.” Manakala Hafiz Jalaluddin as- Sayuti pula berkata, “ Riwayat ini maudhu’. Ianya direka oleh ahli-ahli cerita yang mana di dalamnya terdapat seorang yang majhul.” Selain itu Allamah Muhammad Thahir bin Ali al-Hindi pula berkata, “ Kisah Abu Syahmah anak Saidina Umar ini adalah cerita rekaan oleh ahli cerita.” Daruqutni pula berkata ,” Riwayat Mujahid ini tidak sahih.”
Sebenarnya kisah ini terdapat tiga versi yang sedikit sebanyak ada tokok tambah. Ianya terdapat dua riwayat iaitu dari Said bin Masruq dan Abu al-Quddus.
Antara kesan kecacatannya adalah seperti berikut :
1. Perawi kisah ini menggunakan perkataan ‘Ghulam’. Pada beberapa tempat maknanya adalah berbeza-beza. Sesetengahnya perkataan ‘Ghulam’ bermakna ‘Hamba’ namun pada tempat yang lain pula bermakna ‘budak lelaki’. Ini menunjukkan dengan jelas bahawa pereka cerita ini adalah orang Parsi, yang mana bahasa Arab bukan bahasa ibundanya. Kekadang ia tersasul menggunakan makna bahasa Arab dan kekadang di dalam makna Parsi. Dalam bahasa Parsi perkataan ‘ghulam’ bermakna ‘hamba atau khadam’. Manakala di dalam bahasa Arab pula ‘ghulam’ bermakna ‘budak lelaki yang belum baligh’. Tentunya perkataan ‘ghulam ‘ pada makna ‘hamba’ tidak boleh digunakan untuk Abu Syahmah, yang mana sepatutnya dengan makna Arab yakni ‘budak lelaki’. Namun begitu perkataan ‘ghulam’ pun tidak juga boleh digunakan untuk menunjukan semua peringkat budak lelaki. Ianya hanya merujuk kepada budak lelaki yang belum baligh sahaja.
2. Jika ‘ghulam ‘ dirujuk kepada Abu Syahmah sebagaimana yang dinyatakan di dalam kisah berkenaan, maka ini menunjukan bahawa kisah ini tidak logik. Mana mungkin budak yang belum baligh boleh berbuat demikian dan mana mungkin hukuman tersebut boleh dikenakan kepada anak kecil.
3. Di dalam kisah berkenaan, Aflah atau Muflih adalah hamba Saidina Umar r.a sedangkan hamba saidina Umar r.a yang ada di dalam catitan sejarah bernama Aslam bukannya Aflah atau Muflih. Aflah atau muflih adalah nama seorang muazzin di masjid Nabi saw. Saidina Umar telah melantiknya menjadi muazzin di masjid Nabawi.
4. Di dalam cerita berkenaan digambarkan bahawa wanita berkenaan berulang alik ke rumah Saidina Umar r.a dengan membawa anaknya. Ini menunjukkan bahawa ianya seorang wanita yang telah berkahwin, bukan gadis. Umar r.a pula tidak mengenalinya dan hanya mengenalinya takala melihatnya di masjid.
5. Sepatutnya wanita berkenaan melaporkan kejadian berkenaan pada peringkat awal kejadian. Sikap berdiam diri sehingga melahirkan anaknya dan telah besar membuktikan bahawa kejadian itu berlaku dengan kerelaannya. Maka kedua-duanya sepatutnya dihukum.
6. Nama Abu Syahmah adalah nama “kunyah” dan ianya tidak jelas siapakah orang yang di’kunyah’kan. Jika ianya dikunyahkan pada anaknya maka kisah ini menjadi begitu lucu kerana seorang yang ada anak bererti “zina muhsan” yang mana hukum sebenarnya adalah ‘rejam’ (lihat pada posting bulan Jan 2010 : Hukum Rejam Bagi Penzina)
7. Sesiapa yang membaca cerita ini akan tergambar bahawa suasana Madinah semasa pemerintahan Saidina Umar r.a dipenuhi dengan arak. Kedai-kedai arak di mana-mana, malah anak-anak sahabat yang ulung juga tidak ketinggalan terlibat dengan arak. Betulkah begitu ? Sedangkan Allah swt mengatakan kehidupan mereka sebagai “Hayatan thoiyyiba”.
8. Cacatan sejarah membuktikan bahawa Saidina Umar r.a telah menghalau semua suku-suku Yahudi dari Madinah. Jadi mana mungkin masih ada lagi Yahudi di Madinah?
9. Dikatakan bahawa Abu Syahmah telah meminum arak tersebut di kebun Yahudi Bani an-Najjar dan kejadian zina itu juga berlaku di sana. Tahu tak kita bahawa kebun Bani an-Najjar itu sebenarnya adalah kawasan Masjid Nabi saw dan rumah Abu Ayub an-Ansori juga terdapat di dalam kawasan ini. Kawasan ini telah dibangunkan Masjid Nabi saw ketika Nabi saw hijrah ke Madinah. Ini bermakna, ketika zaman Saidina Umar r.a menjadi khalifah ianya telah tiada.
10. Tindakkan Saidina Umar r.a mengumpulkan penduduk Madinah sebelum siasatan dibuat menunjukkan ceteknya ilmu feqah Saidina Umar r.a sedang ulama-ulama mengatakan bahawa Umar r.a adalah salah seorang yang mahir tentang hukum hakam. ( Cth : Kitab Feqah Saidina Umar r.a karangan Syah Waliyullah Dehlawi )
Atas dasar semua inilah maka Imam Ibn al-Jauzi rah berkata, “ Mula-mula mereka mengatakan Abu Syahmah itu rupanya mirip dengan Rasulullah saw. Kemudian mereka menuduh pula dia merogol perempuan. Perawinya Abu al-Quddus adalah penduta besar.”
Dalam cacatan sejarah yang di akui bahawa Abu Syahmah ini bukanlah nama kunyah (samaran) Ubaidullah tetapi adalah nama samaran Abdul Rahman al-Ausath. Beliau adalah salah seorang anak lelaki Saidina Umar r.a. Cacatan sejarah yang diterima menyatakan beliau pernah bersama robongan Amru bin al-Asy r.a di dalam satu angkatan jihad ke Mesir. Satu hari beliau meminun nabiz dan kebetulan beliau mabuk. Sedangkan nabiz sememangnya adalah halal namun jika telah lama maka ianya akan bertukar rupa dan memabukkan.
Namun begitu beliau telah berjumpa denga Amru bin al-Asy r.a dan meminta hukum had dikenakan ke atas beliau. Namun Amru bin al-Asy r.a tidak mahu melaksanakan kerana beliau tidak mendapati kesan mabuk pada Abdul Rahman serta juga ketiadaan saksi. Abdul Rahman mengertak untuk mengadu kepada ayahnya Saidina Umar r.a dan akhirnya hukuman ini dilaksanakan di dalam khemah dengan tidak diketahui oleh sesiapa pun. Bila berita ini sampai kepada Umar r.a maka beliau menegur Amru bin al-Asy r.a kerana tidak melaksanakannya dikhalayak ramai. Bila Abdul Rahman pulang ke Madinah dengan kemenangan menguasai Mesir, Umar r.a pun melaksanakan hukuman itu sebagai pendidikan dan tarbiah. Secara kebetulan selepas beberapa hari kejadian itu Abdul Rahman pun jatuh sakit dan meninggal dunia.
Selepas mengemukakna cerita ini Ibn Jauzi dan As Sayuti menulis bahawa,” Sekadar inilah asal cerita ini tetapi penulis cerita telah menakuk tambah sehingga menjadi satu cerita yang tersendiri.”
Ini sebahagian kisah-kisah yang telah dibuktikan oleh ulama-ulama yang terkandung “Tabbara” terhadap musuh dan “tawalla” terhadap yang dikasihi iaitu Ali r.a dan keluarganya oleh orang-orang Syiah.
Wallahua’lam.
(Rujukan : Himpunan Kisah-Kisah Benar karangan Abu Sulaiman Nashir)
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Beware of Web Forgery
Web forgeries are designed to trick you into revealing personal or financial information by imitating sources you may trust. Entering any information on this web page may result in identity theft or other fraud. Just delete the email if you received email like below........
"
Subject: [SPAM] Your Public Bank account has been deactivated Your Public Bank Internet Banking has been deactivated due to inactivity on 24th of March 2010.
In order to unlock your Internet Banking, follow these steps:
1. Visit our website: http://adsl-068-016-098-216.sip.asm.bellsouth.net/www2/pbe/
2. Logon to the Internet Banking using your username and password.
3. Confirm your mobile phone number by entering the PAC you receive.
4. After confirming your account, log out. Your account access will be restored.
Thank you for using Public Bank.
Copyright © 2010 Public Bank Berhad (6463-H) ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
ED"
"
Subject: [SPAM] Your Public Bank account has been deactivated Your Public Bank Internet Banking has been deactivated due to inactivity on 24th of March 2010.
In order to unlock your Internet Banking, follow these steps:
1. Visit our website: http://adsl-068-016-098-216.sip.asm.bellsouth.net/www2/pbe/
2. Logon to the Internet Banking using your username and password.
3. Confirm your mobile phone number by entering the PAC you receive.
4. After confirming your account, log out. Your account access will be restored.
Thank you for using Public Bank.
Copyright © 2010 Public Bank Berhad (6463-H) ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
ED"
Aku dah hilang sabar
Seolah-olah kena tipu oleh penjual air-cond. Menyesal aku beli. Pada 31 januari 2010 aku beli. penjual tu kata ok. balik aku pasang langsung tak sejuk berpeluh lagi ada. pasang kipas lagi sejuk.. ni aircond aku beli tu...
pergi balik kat cina tu.. kata tak sejuk.. dia kata you pakai lama2 dia sejuk la... haram tak sejuk dah 2 minggu.... nak tunggu dia mai ambik jangan harap.. last2 aku sendiri pergi hantar kat kedia dia.. di parit buntar.. siang sdn bhd. memang nak kena siang..
memang ada warranty.. 1 tahun.dia hantar balik kilang. sekarang dah sebulan lebih tak dengar apa cerita.. tiap2 minggu aku ke kedai tu... buat macam lupa plak diorang ni... dah masuk minggu ke 5 aku follow up.. lepas ni aku nak pergi lagi.. tak jugak aku nak ambil tindakan buat report.......
pergi balik kat cina tu.. kata tak sejuk.. dia kata you pakai lama2 dia sejuk la... haram tak sejuk dah 2 minggu.... nak tunggu dia mai ambik jangan harap.. last2 aku sendiri pergi hantar kat kedia dia.. di parit buntar.. siang sdn bhd. memang nak kena siang..
memang ada warranty.. 1 tahun.dia hantar balik kilang. sekarang dah sebulan lebih tak dengar apa cerita.. tiap2 minggu aku ke kedai tu... buat macam lupa plak diorang ni... dah masuk minggu ke 5 aku follow up.. lepas ni aku nak pergi lagi.. tak jugak aku nak ambil tindakan buat report.......
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Dunia Pantas
Dunia rasanya 24 jam juga. Tapi masa berlalu begitu pantas. Pejam celik dah seminggu, sebulan, setahun dah separuh umur hidup kat duni ni...
Banyak lagi benda belum buat.. amal banyak lagi kurang.. hutang masih banyak.. ishh..
Banyak lagi benda belum buat.. amal banyak lagi kurang.. hutang masih banyak.. ishh..
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Writing a scientific review paper
Very good for writing review paper.........
General points:
• Try to make your research paper an integrated synthesis of the literature, rather than a jumbled regurgitation of facts.
• Give yourself enough time! For a 10-20 page paper it ideally takes a month to carry out the library searches and to collect the necessary materials (inter-library loans etc).
• Start out with a clear idea of the question you are trying to answer in the paper. Write it somewhere and show it to an advisor to see if it makes sense, is "do-able" etc. In general a simple, specific idea is easier to research and to write about. Equally it must be interesting and inclusive enough to ensure there's enough material available to review.
• Get to know the library a.s.a.p.! Make sure you are familiar with all the resources available to help you locate references. Using the library well will save you hours of work and days of frustration!
• Take notes, including full citations (authors' names, journal, date and page
number) from each paper as you read it. Use index cards or a word processor.
Index cards are nice in that you can shuffle them around, color code ideas on
them, highlight etc. The advantage of using a word processor is that you will later
be able to use your notes to cut and paste together the first draft, plus you'll have all your citations there already which saves time when building your citation list.Organize your notes. "Where did I read that?" is the plague of all writers. The better organized your notes, the less this is a problem.
• Outline your paper before setting pen to paper for anything else! This will help
you to organize your thoughts and will markedly improve the overall quality of
your final product.
• Don't be afraid to write your ideas down before they are perfectly formed. If you can get them down on paper, you can place them in a logical sequence and
develop them into a flowing presentation later.
• Use the draft system: Write a first draft. Leave it for a day or two. Come back to it and revise it as much as you can, then let someone read it. Once they have read it,revise the paper again. Respond to your reviewer's comments and also clarify any passages that seemed to confuse them. Expect that your paper will need revisions and don't feel bad when that turns out to be true.
• Don't write in the first person (I think). This reduces your credibility. Write with authority (It is, they do)
What goes into a review paper?
When writing a review paper your job is to present what is known about a specific topic and to synthesize all the unconnected threads of the individual studies into an integrated "State of the Science" type of review. In your paper you will outline the overall picture of your topic area it is currently understood by scientists in that field. Your paper should clearly outline any problems that are currently being addressed, and explain the basis of any conflicts that exist between experts in the field. If there are important conflicts as a reviewer you are in a position to suggest which side of the conflict has the weight of evidence supporting it and why. For conflicts which, in your opinion, do not yet have a clear resolution, you are also in a position to makes suggestions as to the types of experiments need to be done to resolve those arguments.
Your review paper should have the following sections:
A. Title: As for a research paper, this should be short and inform your reader of the
major ideas that will be discussed.
B. Abstract: Again this should be written last and should summarize the major points made within the body of your paper.
C. Introduction: Your introduction should be short and concise (ca. 1page) and is not given a separate heading from the body of the paper. The purpose of the introduction is to introduce your reader to the ideas that you will be addressing in the body of your paper. In your introduction you should be trying to bring readers from different backgrounds up to speed with the "thesis" or objective of your paper and explain to them why it is that this issue is important. It is not a review of the field... that is what the body of the paper is
for! It is generally written after the body of the paper is completed (so that you know where you've "gone" intellectually in the paper and thus can effectively communicate to your reader what to expect).
D. Body: In this portion of your paper you will outline the background for your idea and begin to synthesize ideas from the papers you've read in order to build a coherent "thesis". Before you write this section, figure out what your perspective is going to be (what are you trying to show?). Having done this, try to present your ideas in such a way that they build your discussion logically towards your goal. Outlines will be a big help to
you at this stage. Frequently using headings (e.g. History of the idea, Specific conflicts etc.) can help you to systematically address each important point that you wish to make, as well as helping your reader to follow your arguments. Once you've developed your headings you can then go back and place topic sentences for each paragraphs of information you wish to convey under the appropriate heading. Each paragraph should
have clear, well thought out points, and should contain only the information needed to make or support that point. Fill in each paragraph with more details until you have a coherent argument building towards your final, concluding statement.
E. Conclusion: Like the introduction, the conclusion section is not usually separated from the body of the paper, although it can be if it is really long. In this section you should restate the objective(s) of your paper and point out how you have satisfied these goals. It should also reiterate what the major conclusions (ideas) of your study are.
F. Acknowledgments: Again this should include only people who made considerable impact on your research... people with whom you had fruitful discussions, a librarian who spent hours with you trying to track down an elusive publication that was key to your research etc.
G. Literature Cited. Should follow the standard format outlined by the journal in which you will publish.
http://www.dentistry.leeds.ac.uk/elective/WRITE%20UP.htm
General points:
• Try to make your research paper an integrated synthesis of the literature, rather than a jumbled regurgitation of facts.
• Give yourself enough time! For a 10-20 page paper it ideally takes a month to carry out the library searches and to collect the necessary materials (inter-library loans etc).
• Start out with a clear idea of the question you are trying to answer in the paper. Write it somewhere and show it to an advisor to see if it makes sense, is "do-able" etc. In general a simple, specific idea is easier to research and to write about. Equally it must be interesting and inclusive enough to ensure there's enough material available to review.
• Get to know the library a.s.a.p.! Make sure you are familiar with all the resources available to help you locate references. Using the library well will save you hours of work and days of frustration!
• Take notes, including full citations (authors' names, journal, date and page
number) from each paper as you read it. Use index cards or a word processor.
Index cards are nice in that you can shuffle them around, color code ideas on
them, highlight etc. The advantage of using a word processor is that you will later
be able to use your notes to cut and paste together the first draft, plus you'll have all your citations there already which saves time when building your citation list.Organize your notes. "Where did I read that?" is the plague of all writers. The better organized your notes, the less this is a problem.
• Outline your paper before setting pen to paper for anything else! This will help
you to organize your thoughts and will markedly improve the overall quality of
your final product.
• Don't be afraid to write your ideas down before they are perfectly formed. If you can get them down on paper, you can place them in a logical sequence and
develop them into a flowing presentation later.
• Use the draft system: Write a first draft. Leave it for a day or two. Come back to it and revise it as much as you can, then let someone read it. Once they have read it,revise the paper again. Respond to your reviewer's comments and also clarify any passages that seemed to confuse them. Expect that your paper will need revisions and don't feel bad when that turns out to be true.
• Don't write in the first person (I think). This reduces your credibility. Write with authority (It is, they do)
What goes into a review paper?
When writing a review paper your job is to present what is known about a specific topic and to synthesize all the unconnected threads of the individual studies into an integrated "State of the Science" type of review. In your paper you will outline the overall picture of your topic area it is currently understood by scientists in that field. Your paper should clearly outline any problems that are currently being addressed, and explain the basis of any conflicts that exist between experts in the field. If there are important conflicts as a reviewer you are in a position to suggest which side of the conflict has the weight of evidence supporting it and why. For conflicts which, in your opinion, do not yet have a clear resolution, you are also in a position to makes suggestions as to the types of experiments need to be done to resolve those arguments.
Your review paper should have the following sections:
A. Title: As for a research paper, this should be short and inform your reader of the
major ideas that will be discussed.
B. Abstract: Again this should be written last and should summarize the major points made within the body of your paper.
C. Introduction: Your introduction should be short and concise (ca. 1page) and is not given a separate heading from the body of the paper. The purpose of the introduction is to introduce your reader to the ideas that you will be addressing in the body of your paper. In your introduction you should be trying to bring readers from different backgrounds up to speed with the "thesis" or objective of your paper and explain to them why it is that this issue is important. It is not a review of the field... that is what the body of the paper is
for! It is generally written after the body of the paper is completed (so that you know where you've "gone" intellectually in the paper and thus can effectively communicate to your reader what to expect).
D. Body: In this portion of your paper you will outline the background for your idea and begin to synthesize ideas from the papers you've read in order to build a coherent "thesis". Before you write this section, figure out what your perspective is going to be (what are you trying to show?). Having done this, try to present your ideas in such a way that they build your discussion logically towards your goal. Outlines will be a big help to
you at this stage. Frequently using headings (e.g. History of the idea, Specific conflicts etc.) can help you to systematically address each important point that you wish to make, as well as helping your reader to follow your arguments. Once you've developed your headings you can then go back and place topic sentences for each paragraphs of information you wish to convey under the appropriate heading. Each paragraph should
have clear, well thought out points, and should contain only the information needed to make or support that point. Fill in each paragraph with more details until you have a coherent argument building towards your final, concluding statement.
E. Conclusion: Like the introduction, the conclusion section is not usually separated from the body of the paper, although it can be if it is really long. In this section you should restate the objective(s) of your paper and point out how you have satisfied these goals. It should also reiterate what the major conclusions (ideas) of your study are.
F. Acknowledgments: Again this should include only people who made considerable impact on your research... people with whom you had fruitful discussions, a librarian who spent hours with you trying to track down an elusive publication that was key to your research etc.
G. Literature Cited. Should follow the standard format outlined by the journal in which you will publish.
http://www.dentistry.leeds.ac.uk/elective/WRITE%20UP.htm
JUMAAT: Adakah Ia Satu Kebetulan Atau Petanda?
Sesuatu yang menarik perhatian aku berkaitan Jumaat dalam tahun 2010..........
"Renungkanlah.....
27-11-2009 Jumaat Hari Raya AidilAdha
18-12-2009 Jumaat Tahun Baru Hijrah
25-12-2009 Jumaat Sambutan Krismas
01-01-2010 Jumaat Tahun Baru Masihi
26-02-2010 Jumaat Sambutan Maulud NABI SAW
28-06-2010 Jumaat Hari Wesak
05-11-2010 Jumaat Sambutan Depavali
10-09-2010 Jumaat Hari Raya AidilFitri
01-01-2010 Jumaat Gerhana Bulan
15-01-2010 Jumaat Gerhana Matahari
"Renungkanlah.....
27-11-2009 Jumaat Hari Raya AidilAdha
18-12-2009 Jumaat Tahun Baru Hijrah
25-12-2009 Jumaat Sambutan Krismas
01-01-2010 Jumaat Tahun Baru Masihi
26-02-2010 Jumaat Sambutan Maulud NABI SAW
28-06-2010 Jumaat Hari Wesak
05-11-2010 Jumaat Sambutan Depavali
10-09-2010 Jumaat Hari Raya AidilFitri
01-01-2010 Jumaat Gerhana Bulan
15-01-2010 Jumaat Gerhana Matahari
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Skim khas profesor elak politiking
KUALA LUMPUR 10 Mac – Kajian semula terhadap skim perkhidmatan pensyarah berupaya mengelakkan politiking dalam universiti kerana golongan profesor tidak perlu berebut untuk memegang jawatan pentadbiran.
Menteri Pengajian Tinggi, Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin berkata, langkah itu juga membolehkan para profesor memberi tumpuan kepada kepakaran sebenar mereka menjalankan penyelidikan membangunkan negara dan menjayakan Model Ekonomi Baru (MEB).
“Langkah ini selaras dengan usaha kementerian untuk memartabatkan dan mempertingkatkan pencapaian sektor pengajian tinggi secara keseluruhan.
“Saya percaya usaha ini bakal memperlihatkan kecemerlangan profesor dalam bidang masing-masing serta dikenali sebagai pakar terkemuka di peringkat kebangsaan mahupun antarabangsa,” katanya dalam satu kenyataan di sini hari ini.
Beliau mengulas langkah kerajaan mengkaji skim perkhidmatan pensyarah institusi pengajian tinggi awam (IPTA) dan institut perguruan (IP) termasuk membenarkan kenaikan pangkat bagi profesor hingga ke peringkat turus tertinggi tanpa perlu memegang jawatan pentadbiran dalam universiti.
Berita baik buat semua pensyarah... Tapi tu untuk profesor..jauh lagi perjalanan nak sampai jadi profesor...
Menteri Pengajian Tinggi, Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin berkata, langkah itu juga membolehkan para profesor memberi tumpuan kepada kepakaran sebenar mereka menjalankan penyelidikan membangunkan negara dan menjayakan Model Ekonomi Baru (MEB).
“Langkah ini selaras dengan usaha kementerian untuk memartabatkan dan mempertingkatkan pencapaian sektor pengajian tinggi secara keseluruhan.
“Saya percaya usaha ini bakal memperlihatkan kecemerlangan profesor dalam bidang masing-masing serta dikenali sebagai pakar terkemuka di peringkat kebangsaan mahupun antarabangsa,” katanya dalam satu kenyataan di sini hari ini.
Beliau mengulas langkah kerajaan mengkaji skim perkhidmatan pensyarah institusi pengajian tinggi awam (IPTA) dan institut perguruan (IP) termasuk membenarkan kenaikan pangkat bagi profesor hingga ke peringkat turus tertinggi tanpa perlu memegang jawatan pentadbiran dalam universiti.
Berita baik buat semua pensyarah... Tapi tu untuk profesor..jauh lagi perjalanan nak sampai jadi profesor...
Rumah tengah naik
Alhamdulillah recently i went back to Pahang... on the way from Pekan I visited my new house still in progress... here is the photo.. it is expected by the end of this year will finish.. may be early of next year..
Insyallah hopefully everything on schedule...
Insyallah hopefully everything on schedule...
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
Daughters
My two daughters...... Insyirah 4 years & Iffah 1.5 years
di giant bayan baru, pulau pinang
Taman Ilmu
Tepi sungai pekan lama
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Manfaat Dan Khasiat Buah Salak Untuk kesehatan
Manfaat buah salak bagi kesehatan buah salak memang sangat bermanfaat bagi kesehatan salah satu manfaat buah salak bagi kesehatan adalah u...
-
Manfaat buah salak bagi kesehatan buah salak memang sangat bermanfaat bagi kesehatan salah satu manfaat buah salak bagi kesehatan adalah u...
-
By Sheikh Amin Abu Anas The Friday prayer (Juma’ah Salat) is very important for each Muslim, male and female, because it is their weekly...






